Chicago, IL — The jury begun its deliberations within the R. Kelly federal trial at Dirksen U.S. Courthouse on Tuesday, the place it would resolve the destiny of the disgraced singer who’s charged with 13 counts of manufacturing and receiving baby pornography, engaging minors to interact in legal sexual exercise, and conspiracy to impede justice. Jurors may even rule on associated fees for his co-defendants, former enterprise supervisor Derrel McDavid and former assistant Milton “June” Brown.

McDavid is charged on one rely of conspiracy to obtain baby pornography, two counts of receiving baby pornography, and one rely of conspiracy to impede justice. (The latter cost was associated to Kelly’s 2008 baby pornography trial that centered on a Jane Doe, with the videotape a spotlight of the present trial.) Kelly’s former worker Brown is additionally charged with receiving baby pornography as a part of an alleged effort to get well lacking tapes that allegedly present Kelly engaged in intercourse acts with minors. All three males have pleaded not responsible.

Before the deliberations started Tuesday afternoon, Kelly’s lead legal professional Jennifer Bonjean requested jurors to place apart what they knew of the singer and “consider Robert Kelly as a John Doe,” like a number of the accusers who testified towards him. She requested the jurors do their job to resolve the case primarily based solely on the proof that was introduced within the present trial.

“Your beliefs [are] not proof… You can suppose he’s essentially the most amoral individual on the planet,” she mentioned, however she added that the “doubtful proof” the prosecution introduced ought to lead the jury to search out him “not responsible of all of the counts,” she mentioned on the finish of her closing argument.

Over the course of 4 weeks, Bonjean mentioned, a few of what was introduced in trial had nothing to do with this case, together with accusations from Tiffany Hawkins and different lawsuits, alongside intercourse tapes allegedly made that aren’t related to the present fees.

She famous Jane —  the 14-year-old girl central to the present trial and the one in 2008 whom Kelly is allegedly depicted molesting in video clips that had been played for the jury — had initially denied her involvement and that she by no means mentioned she was “compelled” by Kelly to take action, regardless of Jane identifying herself now, 20 years later. In truth, he and Jane additionally continued to be pleasant, Bonjean added, exchanging texts into 2019 round when the docuseries Surviving R. Kelly arrived.

Like McDavid’s lead legal professional Beau Brindley outlined throughout his closing argument on Monday, Bonjean reiterated that a number of the witnesses had been granted immunity in trade for his or her testimony, lots of whom she mentioned had been liars and extortionists who took benefit of Kelly. This included Charles Freeman, who was paid to retrieve “efficiency tapes” — not baby porn, she mentioned. She additionally questioned the existence of Video 4, which the prosecution claimed depicted Van Allen, Jane and Kelly partaking in intercourse acts, nevertheless it was by no means introduced in trial. Likewise, fifth alleged survivor “Brittany” — whom Jane and Pauline mentioned they had been concerned in threesomes with Kelly when the women had been all underage — was absent from the proceedings.

It all amounted to “manipulation to create a story to go well with them,” Bonjean mentioned of the prosecution’s case towards her shopper. As she concluded and requested jurors to search out Kelly not responsible, she reminded them that “each rely counts,” as she mentioned originally of her closing argument, the place she urged them to take their time, think about every rely, and think about every defendant and their respective fees individually.

During the prosecution’s rebuttal argument, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeannice Appenteng drove residence a number of of the factors fellow Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Pozolo detailed the day earlier than throughout the prosecution’s closing assertion.

“R. Kelly needed to have what he wished,” she mentioned, quoting earlier testimony from McDavid. What R. Kelly wished, Appenting mentioned, was to “have intercourse with younger women,” and his co-defendants allegedly labored to assist him cowl that up.

“You noticed how he was utilizing her physique, flipping her over, throwing her round like she was some rag doll,” Appenteng added, reminding the jurors of the clip they noticed which allegedly depicted Kelly paying cash to Jane in order that if anybody noticed it, Jane mentioned, it could seem that she was a prostitute. “That’s what this case is about. Jane. Those movies.”

Appenteng additionally blasted McDavid’s claims that he was unaware of Kelly sexually abusing underage women whereas he labored for him as a CPA and enterprise supervisor and as his pal. He was “conveniently absent” throughout essential choices and moments regardless of primarily having pores and skin within the recreation, and as an alternative deferred to the authorized group he assembled, three of whom are lifeless, successfully taking “himself out of the narrative.”

She mentioned that McDavid’s group utilizing Kelly’s acquittal within the 2008 trial to show the purpose their shopper is harmless was reasonably unimaginable as a result of “that jury was scammed,” she mentioned. “That case was mounted as a result of Robert Kelly, Derrel McDavid, and others prompted Jane to misinform the grand jury and be absent from trial.”

Appenteng ended by bringing it again to the accusers. “Jane was a baby. Nia was a baby,” she instructed the jury. The other accusers had been additionally all youngsters, she mentioned, and the defendants needs to be discovered responsible.

The jury didn’t attain a verdict after deliberating on Tuesday afternoon. They are anticipated to proceed deliberations on Wednesday.

: .